|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Jennifer en Marland
Black Rise Expeditions
2
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 14:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
solecist project wrote:I haven't seen any of these two yesterday and people were actually really happy about my presence. I had quite a few chats and I initiated a quiz and I'm still waiting for somebody to come up with the right answer. Of course it's about ganking. Doesn't matter.
Your view of them is highly +¡naccurate, yet partly true. Some people are actually dedicated. Some simply try. Some just want to protect their fellow corpmembers.
If there are any selfrighteous people, I haven't really met them yesterday.
I'm glad your time in our channel left you with a somewhat positive view of us 
admiral root wrote:They also seem to have an obsession with using cloaked ships to surprise gankers, and wanting to camp multiple gates and stations at the same time in the hopes of killing someone who's -5 or below. Their purpose for those camps is to safeguard mining ops - they give you a blank look when you suggest that it would be easier (and require fewer people) to simply camp your own mining op.
We're not trying to guard our own mining ops - not least because quite a few of us aren't miners.We're trying to guard anyone what the local gankers might try to target - so sitting in one place won't work 
admiral root wrote:Some AntiGankers are probably self righteous delusionalists. (is that even a word? I like it) It means that they believe to be the moral highground and everyone who isn't as good as them ... ... or doesn't agree with them ... ... is somehow bad/etc.
These are bad. Actually worse than most gankers.
Yeah, I think you're right. I apologise if I've been guilty of this.
admiral root wrote:The goal is to sit in a channel being self righteous and throwing a party every time someone whores on a Concord killmail. Apparently, putting ECM on an already perma-jammed, perma-neuted, perma-scrambled ship is a herculean feat worthy of praise from the gods themselves.
Nope, we jam them before Concord arrives, thats the point Also, I'm guessing that posting successes in a channel containing like minded people probably isn't confined to Anti-Ganking...? 
Quote:Dang, one of the true anti-gankers even set them up a mumble server, but the "leaders" of this group consider hanging out on voice comms to be metagaming to an unacceptable level.
Are you referring to my comment that a Mumble server is outside the game, and therefore fits the definition of metagaming? If so, note the fact that I added the server to the MotD as requested, so I hardly think it's 'unacceptable' 
@Jebediah Phoenix - I didn't know that being silent and refraining from smacktalk was considered ungentlemanly 
|

Jennifer en Marland
Black Rise Expeditions
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 15:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Jennifer en Marland wrote:Nope, we jam them before Concord arrives, thats the point  Also, I'm guessing that posting successes in a channel containing like minded people probably isn't confined to Anti-Ganking...?  My point is that if the gankers still kill their target it's a failure for anyone trying to prevent it. Celebrating failure seems a bit weird to me - we don't throw a party every time we screw up a gank. :P
Yes, thats fair enough. People often say 'miner lived' after posting ECM kills, or they're posted by people who I know wouldn't do so if the miner wasn't saved, in which case it's a victory. But I have seen people post kills where they got like 3% damage on a ganker using drones and clearly didn't really make a contribution - I certainly don't agree with celebrating those kills (I might sometimes say 'gj' to be polite!) And yes, there may well be cases where people post ECM kills and 'forget' to mention that the miner still died.
solecist project wrote:You have gotten a few of these quotes wrong. I thought I'll tell you to make sure that there won't be any confusion.
Which ones? How are they wrong? Army of dolls stole all your perfect imperfections. |

Jennifer en Marland
Black Rise Expeditions
3
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 16:09:00 -
[3] - Quote
Khergit Deserters wrote:Thanks for sharing the intel-- even though I may be using it for my own anti-ganking activities. Well-reasoned intel like this is somewhat scarce and always appreciated . o7
As you can see from my earlier reply to Admiral, some of his intel is disputed  Army of dolls stole all your perfect imperfections. |

Jennifer en Marland
Black Rise Expeditions
4
|
Posted - 2014.04.15 18:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Confirming that whoring in on a CONCORDOKKEN constitutes Anti-ganking.
Anti-ganking would be ganking the ganker BEFORE they ganked..but that would make the anti-ganker a ganker themselves... therefore the only reasonable course of action for an aspiring anti-ganker is to undock and self destruct.
This has been addressed earlier in the thread :3
Army of dolls stole all your perfect imperfections. |
|
|
|